11-20-2009, 10:09 PM | #1 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: '04 Kawasaki ZX6RR
Posts: 3,392
|
Helmet or No Helmet
|
11-20-2009, 10:19 PM | #2 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Insurance companies aren't going to drop rates out of the goodness of their heart.
They should, however, RAISE the rates of anyone caught without a helmet on the police report. |
11-20-2009, 10:20 PM | #3 |
With MORE TYEstosterone
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: TX
Moto: '12 KX450F / 08 YZ250F #512 / 07 KX65 #1
Posts: 1,429
|
Would be? Doubt it. Should be, more like it.
And no I still wouldn't ride without one. My only exception is if I just finished some minor work on the bike and I need to see if it's operating correctly and I just pull onto my neighborhood street. Most of the time I don't even get away with that if my garage helper is around. |
11-20-2009, 10:31 PM | #4 |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central NY
Moto: 2003 SV650S
Posts: 14,959
|
Not even an option in my mind (which I'd like to keep from being splattered on the street).
__________________
I'm not "fat." I'm "Enlarged to show texture." Handle every stressful situation like a DOG: If you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it & walk away. |
11-20-2009, 10:43 PM | #5 |
Soul Man
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Everywhere, all the time.
Moto: '0000 Custom Turbo Cross (with jet kit).
Posts: 6,481
|
I trust insurance companies as far as I can comfortably spit a rat, which is to say, not very far.
However, I do not believe in mandatory helmet, or seat belt laws, for anyone over he age of 21. It's your head, do with it what you will. If you've come to the conclusion that you're invincible, go for it. Insurance companies charge higher premiums for young drivers, old drivers, smokers, and other "high risk" groups. I don't agree with all of their reasoning, but if you're not smart enough to wear a helmet, that's on you. In short, I believe in charging people based on their own decisions. JC
__________________
The way things are going, they're gonna crucify me. |
11-20-2009, 10:50 PM | #6 |
Hopster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Moto: 2009 Buell 1125R
Posts: 4,743
|
I don't know, but rates should definitely be lower for people who voluntarily wear them.
Yeah yeah, I know... how can you prove something like that? It's kind of like companies that offer healthy lifestyle insurance incentives. They have people sign a sworn statement that they'll maintain the conditions of the program and after that you have to just take them at their word. I can't really see insurance companies willingly giving customers a discount based on good faith.
__________________
“Well, obviously before; after was all gendarmes and dick stitches.” |
11-20-2009, 11:04 PM | #7 |
Vrooom
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: 06 ZX6R
Posts: 4,427
|
Mandatory helmets up here and let me tell you about our rates....through the roof!
|
11-20-2009, 11:24 PM | #8 |
WERA White Plate
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NC
Moto: 2009 GSXR 1300
Posts: 2,448
|
|
11-21-2009, 12:02 AM | #9 |
I give Squids a bad name
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fly Over State
Moto: 1996 CBR600 F3 (AKA the Flying Turd)
Posts: 4,742
|
I'd charge people in states with no helmet laws less. Odds are is if someone with no helmet wrecks a bike they won't be calling wanting a new bike.
__________________
lifts - R.I.P. |
11-21-2009, 12:30 AM | #10 |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
I don't like helmet laws personally, the gov shouldnt tell me if I should or shouldnt wear a helmet, my safety gear doesnt affect other drivers on the road. I also dont believe that helmet laws affect insurance rates, 10 miles away from me in PA (no helmet laws) the insurance is less than half of what it cost me in NJ (mandatory helmet)
That being said, if an insurance company wanted to write their policies as to deny you benefits if you get hurt without one, I wouldnt have a problem with that
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|