Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeslice
It shouldn't be too hard to give me the name of a magazine that does comparison tests of cellphone reception strength. I don't need the exact link.
People can say "Yes there is evidence" all they want, but just saying something doesn't make it so. I'd like actual data, along with an explanation of how the tests were conducted.
|
The equipment to test cellular strength accurately costs millions of dollars and requires people trained to run it properly. A 3rd party test house charges a minimum of ~$70,000 to do a minimal development run, you think a magazine is going to pay that for each phone they review? I'm not going to post proprietary information here and speed up the process of my layoff to satisfy your curiosity.
Good luck finding that all-knowing CNET article.