more likely to die, if you wear a lid - Page 2

Rangerscott · 11-05-2011, 02:58 AM

I wear a lid so my pretty face doesnt get fugly.

6doublefive321 · 11-06-2011, 11:44 AM

Table 6 shows 6 total deaths in Alaska, of which 3% were over 0.8% BAC. That equates to 0.18 riders. How does 0.18 of a rider maintain control of a bike? You would think someone would proof read this shit.

Particle Man · 11-06-2011, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6doublefive321

Table 6 shows 6 total deaths in Alaska, of which 3% were over 0.8% BAC. That equates to 0.18 riders. How does 0.18 of a rider maintain control of a bike? You would think someone would proof read this shit.

Facts get in the way of a story.

Cutty72 · 11-08-2011, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RACER X

huh, who woulda ever thunk

look at the last chart

ND only state where 100% of the fatalities were non helmeted!
Wearing a lid in ND will save your life!

Smittie61984 · 11-09-2011, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by askmrjesus

And on their way back from an ABATE rally...

JC

If they were on their way back from an ABATE rally, they probably wouldn't have a lid and would have survived.

Captain Morgan · 11-09-2011, 01:35 AM

Looking at that chart I noticed the numbers were all over the place. I'd guess that states that had such a high number of deaths of motorcyclists wearing helmets, are probably states that require helmets. The numbers at the bottom are totals of all states combined. With some states requiring the use of helmets, that chart does't prove squat about whether or not the helmet saved or cost the rider his life.

fasternyou929 · 11-09-2011, 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RACER X

huh, who woulda ever thunk

look at the last chart

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811389.pdf

More likely to be an idiot, if you draw that conclusion from the article.

I hope you aren't teaching those kids anything. At least give them a fighting chance.

shmike · 11-09-2011, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6doublefive321

Table 6 shows 6 total deaths in Alaska, of which 3% were over 0.8% BAC. That equates to 0.18 riders. How does 0.18 of a rider maintain control of a bike?

That's why they are dead.

It is tough enough to maintain control as only 1/5 of a rider but it's nearly impossible when you're drunk too!

11-06-2011, 11:44 AM	#12
6doublefive321 Resident Droog Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Northern burbs, Atlanta Moto: 625 SMC, '08 Tuono R Posts: 471	Table 6 shows 6 total deaths in Alaska, of which 3% were over 0.8% BAC. That equates to 0.18 riders. How does 0.18 of a rider maintain control of a bike? You would think someone would proof read this shit. __________________ I'm sick and tired of being bored.

11-05-2011, 02:58 AM	#11
Rangerscott Viff6N Mutated Warrior Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Texas Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N Posts: 8,704	I wear a lid so my pretty face doesnt get fugly.

11-09-2011, 01:35 AM	#16
Captain Morgan Let's do another U-turn Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Indiana Moto: 2009 V-Strom Posts: 3,816	Looking at that chart I noticed the numbers were all over the place. I'd guess that states that had such a high number of deaths of motorcyclists wearing helmets, are probably states that require helmets. The numbers at the bottom are totals of all states combined. With some states requiring the use of helmets, that chart does't prove squat about whether or not the helmet saved or cost the rider his life.