{MOVIE SEMI SPOILER} James Bond-Quantum of Solace - Page 2

VatorMan · 11-16-2008, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NONE_too_SOFT

you are fucking strange.

Sometimes strange is better than the pussy you know.

Johnny Rico · 11-16-2008, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VatorMan

Sometimes strange is better than the pussy you know.

And strange pussy is even better than that.

snaps · 11-16-2008, 03:24 PM

Solid "meh" from me too. It was entertaining, and the acting wasn't bad, but they're raping James Bond by making this a sequel - they're all supposed to be standalones.

DLIT · 11-16-2008, 03:37 PM

I thought it was cool. The stunts were amazing. It didn't look like computers were used at all and they looked like raw stunts. I dug it.

LeeNetworX · 11-16-2008, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snaps

Solid "meh" from me too. It was entertaining, and the acting wasn't bad, but they're raping James Bond by making this a sequel - they're all supposed to be standalones.

I believe this story was the only "sequel" Ian Fleming wrote, and it wasn't even a novel. He wrote it because he wanted to show the character trying to deal with losing the woman he loved. Supposedly, he was going through his own marriage problems when he wrote it. I saw Daniel Craig on Leno a couple weeks ago and he was talking about this. They aren't "raping" anything.

NONE_too_SOFT · 11-16-2008, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snaps

Solid "meh" from me too. It was entertaining, and the acting wasn't bad, but they're raping James Bond by making this a sequel - they're all supposed to be standalones.

Bond's already had a trilogy back in the day.

you only live twice
on her mastesy's secret service
diamonds are forever

conery was in the first and last, but i still cant remember who was in on her majesty's secret service as 007

snaps · 11-16-2008, 05:51 PM

Ok, well then in my opinion, which is all I have, I didn't like the fact that it was a sequel.

NONE_too_SOFT · 11-16-2008, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snaps

Ok, well then in my opinion, which is all I have, I didn't like the fact that it was a sequel.

so youre not interested to know about the cartel or whatever that stole away the guy in the beginning and put 2 in dudes head after he drank the motor oil at the end?

snaps · 11-16-2008, 06:28 PM

nope, not really.

fnfalman · 11-17-2008, 01:25 PM

I don't know what the hell some of you people were talking about?

This movie is a continuation (not a sequel), of Casino Royale. They are discovering an organization that is so secret that neither British nor American intelligence agencies knew about and that's what he was trying to find out.

11-16-2008, 03:37 PM	#14
DLIT Clit Commander Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Las Vegas Moto: 2012 Ducati 1199 Panigale S Posts: 4,189	I thought it was cool. The stunts were amazing. It didn't look like computers were used at all and they looked like raw stunts. I dug it. __________________ Dress for the crash. Not the ride.

11-17-2008, 01:25 PM	#20
fnfalman Europhile Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: SoCal Moto: Aprilia RS125, Aprilia SR50 Factory, Aprilia Tuono, BMW Rockster, KTM 990 Adventure Posts: 1,875	I don't know what the hell some of you people were talking about? This movie is a continuation (not a sequel), of Casino Royale. They are discovering an organization that is so secret that neither British nor American intelligence agencies knew about and that's what he was trying to find out. __________________ *Cogito Ergo Vroom - I think therefore I ride*

11-16-2008, 03:24 PM	#13
snaps Crazy like a fox... Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WA Moto: 05 R6 Posts: 76	Solid "meh" from me too. It was entertaining, and the acting wasn't bad, but they're raping James Bond by making this a sequel - they're all supposed to be standalones.

11-16-2008, 05:51 PM	#17
snaps Crazy like a fox... Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WA Moto: 05 R6 Posts: 76	Ok, well then in my opinion, which is all I have, I didn't like the fact that it was a sequel.

11-16-2008, 06:28 PM	#19
snaps Crazy like a fox... Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: WA Moto: 05 R6 Posts: 76	nope, not really.