Man who lost family when jet hit house: I don't blame pilot - Page 2

HurricaneHeather · 12-10-2008, 10:50 AM

And now I am ridiculously sad

But really

smileyman · 12-10-2008, 02:30 PM

Split second decision, lifetime of regret. Liability...Nope shit happens. They widower is a hell of a guy to realize that and not try and cash in. Hope the US does the right thing though.

Particle Man · 12-10-2008, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rider

Dont live near a fucking airport.

All due respect, this has to be the dumbest thing I've seen in a while.

I don't live anywhere near an airport and there are hundreds of planes over my house on a daily basis (commercial, military). You do realize that there are a crazy number of aircraft in the air at any given time? This could be anywhere.

Rider · 12-10-2008, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Particle Man

All due respect, this has to be the dumbest thing I've seen in a while.

I don't live anywhere near an airport and there are hundreds of planes over my house on a daily basis (commercial, military). You do realize that there are a crazy number of aircraft in the air at any given time? This could be anywhere.

Yes, it was called sarcasm. I am in the aircraft industry and I know how many planes are flying.

Particle Man · 12-10-2008, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rider

Yes, it was called sarcasm. I am in the aircraft industry and I know how many planes are flying.

ah. couldn't tell. Carry on.

Corey · 12-10-2008, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Right now he is sorting through all the business cards every law firm within 3000 mile radius has sent him.

He doesn't blame the pilot now but after the lawyers get his ear, there is going to be shitload of blame thrown around.

Why would he sue the pilot? Everyone knows that's chump change. That's why it'll be a lawsuit against McDonnell Douglas for making the F/A-18, the United States Armed Forces for having a contract with McDonnell Douglas to produce the F/A-18, all branches of Government who had a hand in supporting production of the F/A-18, and all branches of the Government that didn't support the production but didn't do enough to stop it, and Walmart, because they're a faceless corporation that people like to pile on and they seem to have plenty of money.

HurricaneHeather · 12-10-2008, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey

Why would he sue the pilot? Everyone knows that's chump change. That's why it'll be a lawsuit against McDonnell Douglas for making the F/A-18, the United States Armed Forces for having a contract with McDonnell Douglas to produce the F/A-18, all branches of Government who had a hand in supporting production of the F/A-18, and all branches of the Government that didn't support the production but didn't do enough to stop it, and Walmart, because they're a faceless corporation that people like to pile on and they seem to have plenty of money.

I'm gonna sue walmart, the greedy sons of bitches....

/

Carry on.

smileyman · 12-10-2008, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HurricaneHeather

I'm gonna sue walmart, the greedy sons of bitches....

/

Carry on.

I'm gonna sue Santa...Big fat judgmental bastard!

HRCNICK11 · 12-10-2008, 06:59 PM

I'm sorry but unless there is some reason that plane should not have been in the sky, like it needed some part replaced and they knew it. Or it had not been inspected. Then there really is not a case. That is as long as it was maintained properly. Its really no ones fault.

Sad as all hell, but no ones fault.

Its a machine, machines break. It might have been a bird strike or some thing are you going to sue the bird for flying near a airport?

ducati_atx · 12-10-2008, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HRCNICK11

I'm sorry but unless there is some reason that plane should not have been in the sky, like it needed some part replaced and they knew it. Or it had not been inspected. Then there really is not a case. That is as long as it was maintained properly. Its really no ones fault.

Sad as all hell, but no ones fault.

Its a machine, machines break. It might have been a bird strike or some thing are you going to sue the bird for flying near a airport?

Machines break because they were:
not maintained improperly.
designed improperly.
manufactured incorrectly.

Accidents like this happen because:
machines break
pilot error.

in each an every one of these cases - there is fault to be applied.

12-10-2008, 02:30 PM	#12
smileyman White Trash Hero Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: NW Arkansas Moto: Buell 1125R Porco Rosso Edition Posts: 4,895	Split second decision, lifetime of regret. Liability...Nope shit happens. They widower is a hell of a guy to realize that and not try and cash in. Hope the US does the right thing though. __________________ Arkriders.com To be the best you must first be willing to risk the worst!

12-10-2008, 10:50 AM	#11
HurricaneHeather AMA Supersport Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Sydney Moto: '98 Honda Fireblade Posts: 3,696	And now I am ridiculously sad But really

12-10-2008, 06:59 PM	#19
HRCNICK11 Canyon Carver Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 429	I'm sorry but unless there is some reason that plane should not have been in the sky, like it needed some part replaced and they knew it. Or it had not been inspected. Then there really is not a case. That is as long as it was maintained properly. Its really no ones fault. Sad as all hell, but no ones fault. Its a machine, machines break. It might have been a bird strike or some thing are you going to sue the bird for flying near a airport?