09-09-2009, 10:23 AM | #11 |
Ornery, scandalous & evil
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Moto: 2004 Scarlet R1
Posts: 5,962
|
|
09-09-2009, 10:23 AM | #12 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Yea it's the jacket and chaps! Jacket was $500 and chaps were $325 retail. I know a lot of people are down on Icon but I'd put construction and materials up against anyone in the same price range. On a side note, has everyone seen the $1,300 jacket from A*....are you kidding me? The pants are about the same price...
http://www.alpinestars.com/365_GoreT.../p/310900.html |
09-09-2009, 10:30 AM | #13 |
giggity
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: socal
Moto: street, sumo & dirty
Posts: 1,071
|
|
09-09-2009, 10:31 AM | #14 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Yep a guy I know in town that pulled a Phillipino chick over here and married her! He said he was tired of American women attitudes. He kind of got himself a permanent maid and sex slave the way it sounds... Wait, I said that like it's a BAD thing!
|
09-09-2009, 10:32 AM | #15 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
|
09-09-2009, 10:38 AM | #16 |
moderator chick
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
|
I don't understand the warnings on the labels of much of their gear... that states it is NOT designed as safety equipment. Hell, at that point you might as well just spend $500 for a pair of last season's Blahniks....
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"? Come Play at the Track!! http://www.elitetrackdays.com |
09-09-2009, 10:59 AM | #17 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Hahaha! I haven't heard that one in a while! I have several Icon jackets. The only such tag that ever appeared was a tag stating that their jacket wasn't "tested" to pass EC regulations 1992 (S.L. 1992/3139) and therefore cannot be "considered" personal protective equipment by those regulations. The truth is that Icon used as thick of leather as anyone and CE approved armor since day one. FWIW that was a condition that only pertained to some of their earliest garments and has been since rectified with EC certification. I completely acknowledge that no pair of chaps is ever going to pass EC certification imho. Btw I challenge anyone to find a company willing to guarantee complete protection in case of a crash. At least no one is writing articles claiming that a cheese and cabbage sandwich offers better protection! It's been a while since we've had an Icon battle! Bring it on!!!!
|
09-09-2009, 11:04 AM | #18 |
Vrooom
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: 06 ZX6R
Posts: 4,427
|
I don't get the icon bashing either.
I have a merc jacket that's held up amazing well. I've never been down in it but compared to other textiles I've seen it's the same or better construction. Also can't seem to find the label in it that tells me it's not safety gear. I think it looks pretty good for street gear and gives everyone more choice. I'm all for that. |
09-09-2009, 11:07 AM | #19 | |
moderator chick
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
|
Quote:
I just choose to purchase and wear items that are better than those. But then, I DO understand buying European elitest machines
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"? Come Play at the Track!! http://www.elitetrackdays.com |
|
09-09-2009, 11:23 AM | #20 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
Haha, conversely I know that even if I could prove that a $300 Icon jacket offers the same or even better protection as a $900 Dainese/A* you'd still buy the more expensive jacket just to snub your nose at us plebeians! I guess I DO actually understand the elitist mindset after all. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|