02-12-2011, 12:07 AM | #11 | |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
Quote:
Victory (great bike, but a harley clone) Indian, same as victory. Confederate, built on the Vtwin platform Buell, great bike driven into the ground by harley, truley squandered potential Fischer, a decent bike nobody ever heard of Roehr, the american version of Bimoto, also nobodys ever heard of it I love the idea of owning a small boutique brand bike, but I don't think I will ever, just too many variables. I seriously considered a buell instead of the KLR, but even that, the most successful non cruiser american bike company has failed us.
__________________
|
|
02-12-2011, 12:16 AM | #12 |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
If they're smart, they'll license that engine design to others. That would even be great in a small car, an ATV, small inboard...
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
02-12-2011, 12:28 AM | #13 |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
Now there is an idea, start small, and if you are a sucess, build a bussiness from there!
__________________
|
02-12-2011, 01:07 AM | #14 | |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Quote:
Either way I hope they pull it off and make it happen... WOW would it be amazing! |
|
02-12-2011, 02:12 AM | #15 |
Semi-reformed Squid
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 531
|
Mechanically the push-rod style motor is less simple just because there are extra parts & geometry involved vs. over-head cam designs. P/R valvetrains have more parts/sub-parts (typically lifter, pushrod, rocker-arm & all the associated bits), and more parts = more mass & friction/deflection/hot-spots/wear-points = generally less rpm/surface-speed attainable than more efficient OHC designs. But the geometry of the blocks & heads (both casting & required machining - really factors-in when considering oil-passages, I think) & cam-drive mechanism, and adjustment of valve clearance are generally simpler & more easily accomplished (or automatic, with hydraulic lifters/lash-adjusters). As for making torque - p/r don't increase the torque a motor produces, they're just generally used in large-displacement relatively low-rpm motors which tend to have more & are tuned for bottom-end torque. All that said, p/r technology still does a hell of a job in many applications, has for decades and will for many more - it's just not as well-suited to very high-rpm operation & is *relatively* 'old-fashioned' technology. Some of the best things are though!
O/H cam & shim-under-bucket is about as mechanically simple & efficient (fewest parts, least reciprocating mass/energy wasted) as you can get, but the manufacturing tech & precision required is a LOT higher to produce the parts (block & heads, mostly). Can be a real PITA to deal with clearance adjustment also, of course - what with having to pull elaborate air-boxes/hosing & throttle-bodies & shit just to *start* removing the camshafts (and usually cam chain/tensioner) + having to measure/calculate/replace shims which MUST be meticulously & correctly done. Believe me, sometimes I've *wished* I could just slide a couple tubes up & be done with a couple wrench-twists, without having to take much if anything off to get to them! Last edited by Kerry_129; 02-12-2011 at 02:16 AM.. |
02-12-2011, 03:32 AM | #16 |
RIP REX
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Moto: 2008 1125R
Posts: 7,467
|
|
02-12-2011, 06:01 AM | #17 | |
Chaotic Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cherry Hill NJ
Moto: GV1200 Madura, Hawk gt
Posts: 13,992
|
Quote:
__________________
TWF Post whore #6 |
|
02-12-2011, 07:43 AM | #18 |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Thanks kerry for a much better detailed post. It was more better. I heart pr and have had it on many motors both bike, car, truck, and tractor. I love em.
I luv this whole idea and concept. I wish them the best and hope to see this in a showroom. Hopefully they make good alliances. They should start talking to erik being he's getting ready to bring a non-hd street buell back to the market. |
02-12-2011, 08:05 AM | #19 |
Hold mah beer!
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 80 Miles South of Moto Heaven
Moto: 08 R1200GS
Posts: 23,268
|
Never going to do anything. I don't get my panties wet when I see Ehmurican on shit though.
Dey took our jubs! |
02-12-2011, 09:17 AM | #20 |
gun totin redneck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South West New Hampshire
Moto: turbo busa 999 Duc Goldwing & Victory
Posts: 1,130
|
I don't own one anymore and Don't mean to quibble but the Victory Drive train is hardly a HD Clone.
Overhead Cams,, gear driven primary and cassette tranny. Make it Very Different than any of the V twin Pushrod bikes, better to compair it tot he Metric Cruisers. That said I would love to see Motus put out a bike. Test Dynos are notoriously optimistic. Even so a Production V 4 with even 100 ft Lbs of torgue could make a Fun Power Cruiser.
__________________
Evolution requires a body count, Count or be Counted! |
Bookmarks |
|
|