Need camera that takes super close shots. - Page 3

Homeslice · 11-24-2010, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber Lamps

I've honestly had cameras on phones that were comparable to a $200 p&s camera.

Such as the Epic 4G, whose camera blows away any Droid, Evo or iPhone

Kaneman · 11-24-2010, 07:41 PM

You're not going to get a camera that takes "super close" pics for anywhere near $200. Add a 0 to that and you can start thinking about macro shots. Yes I know lots of P&S cameras have macro mode...its not the same.

Homeslice · 11-24-2010, 07:47 PM

P&S cameras might not have a separate lens like an SLR, but if the autofocus can actually focus that close, that's all that matters.

Even if the 1cm claim is bogus, I can still guarantee they could get down to a couple inches, which is close enough.

All macro is is a setting that allows the autofocus to focus in on something close......It isn't fake digital manipulation like digital zoom, if that's what you're thinking.

Papa_Complex · 11-24-2010, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rangerscott

I can look up spec sheets myself. I need feedback of cameras ya'll have actually used.

Then I would suggest an Olympus E-620 with a Sigma 150mm F2.8 macro lens. Increased depth of field over a classic SLR body, due to the smaller than normal sensor, and a lens that's capable of 1:1 focusing, capable of producing studio quality macro and product shots. That's going to cost over $1200.00.

... but you wanted something I had experience with

Rangerscott · 11-24-2010, 07:53 PM

Guys. I'm taking close ups of oil pumps and shit. Not natures vagina.

Like I said. My kodak v1253 took great close up just cm away. My more expensive sony has to be 8" or more to focus in macro.

I don't need to spend that much to get a good macro.

Amber Lamps · 11-24-2010, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaneman

You're not going to get a camera that takes "super close" pics for anywhere near $200. Add a 0 to that and you can start thinking about macro shots. Yes I know lots of P&S cameras have macro mode...its not the same.

While I agree that a DSLR may be in order here, I don't agree with that dollar figure. I got my Sony for about $300 and a decent macro lense can be had for another $30-50. Heck, I got my 100-300 lens for $100 at Best Buy. Speaking as a rank amature, this set up is PLENTY good enough for me. I MIGHT buy a external flash just for shits and giggles and that will pretty much do it for me.

EpyonXero · 11-24-2010, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber Lamps

a decent macro lense can be had for another $30-50.

No.

Amber Lamps · 11-24-2010, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EpyonXero

No.

Um...YES,

I said "decent", I understand that we are not all professional photographers...

http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Profess...643728&sr=8-10

I found tons of macro lenses for under $50.

Kaneman · 11-24-2010, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

P&S cameras might not have a separate lens like an SLR, but if the autofocus can actually focus that close, that's all that matters.

Even if the 1cm claim is bogus, I can still guarantee they could get down to a couple inches, which is close enough.

All macro is is a setting that allows the autofocus to focus in on something close......It isn't fake digital manipulation like digital zoom, if that's what you're thinking.

There is a difference between true macro or "super close" like he said, and just close. Macro mode on a P&S will get you close, and it will probably look sharp if you're creative with your lighting....but its not "super close" and its not really macrophotography.

EpyonXero · 11-24-2010, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber Lamps

Um...YES,

I said "decent", I understand that we are not all professional photographers...

http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Profess...643728&sr=8-10

I found tons of macro lenses for under $50.

Eh, those are diopters which you attach to a regular lens to let you focus closer. I wouldnt call them "macro lenses".

11-24-2010, 07:41 PM	#22
Kaneman AMA Supersport Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Odessa, TX Moto: 2000 Honda CBR1100XX Blackbird Posts: 4,931	You're not going to get a camera that takes "super close" pics for anywhere near $200. Add a 0 to that and you can start thinking about macro shots. Yes I know lots of P&S cameras have macro mode...its not the same. __________________ 1982 Honda XR80 - blown motor, 1993 Kawasaki ZX6D - sold, 2001 Suzuki Bandit 1200S - sold, 1984 Honda Magna - sold, 2001 Kawasaki ZRX1200R - blown motor, 2007 Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom - totalled, 2003 Yamaha FZ1 - sold, 1994 Honda Magna - sold, 2001 Honda CBR600F4i - sold, 1998 Suzuki DR350 - stolen, 1989 Honda Super Magna - sold, 2007 Yamaha Stratoliner, 2000 Honda CBR 1100XX Blackbird

11-24-2010, 07:47 PM	#23
Homeslice Elitist Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: SF Bay Area Moto: Gix 750 Posts: 11,351	P&S cameras might not have a separate lens like an SLR, but if the autofocus can actually focus that close, that's all that matters. Even if the 1cm claim is bogus, I can still guarantee they could get down to a couple inches, which is close enough. All macro is is a setting that allows the autofocus to focus in on something close......It isn't fake digital manipulation like digital zoom, if that's what you're thinking. Last edited by Homeslice; 11-24-2010 at 07:58 PM..

11-24-2010, 07:53 PM	#25
Rangerscott Viff6N Mutated Warrior Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Texas Moto: '01 Honda VFR 800 & '09 ER-6N Posts: 8,704	Guys. I'm taking close ups of oil pumps and shit. Not natures vagina. Like I said. My kodak v1253 took great close up just cm away. My more expensive sony has to be 8" or more to focus in macro. I don't need to spend that much to get a good macro.