06-29-2009, 12:23 AM | #21 |
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R
Posts: 989
|
Didnt he have a full carbon fiber body kit on his? I love the Sebi-moto set.
__________________
Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war! |
06-29-2009, 12:26 AM | #22 |
yellow don't corner well
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, KS
Moto: 06 ZX10R
Posts: 1,243
|
not only that but different dynos will give you different numbers. two different people could get different numbers. tire pressure, new tire or old, compound...lots of variables.
__________________
|
06-29-2009, 12:34 AM | #23 |
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R
Posts: 989
|
Yes...Dyno numbers are ridiculously innaccurate, but would that not work to all bikes, all makes and all mods? I think the arguement is stupid...but its also stupid to call whole group of riders who try every possible way to upgrade a an old, out of date engine and wring the absolute last horsepower out of it in the least invasive-least expensive way possible...but thats about 75% of anyone who owns a bike/car.
__________________
Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war! |
06-29-2009, 12:35 AM | #24 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Yea, we all have our pet arguments I guess. I was just looking at an Akrapovic ad and they claim only 7.8 hp with a full system on an R1... that's only about 5% and that's from arguably the best exhaust manufacturer there is! For the record, btw, a couple teams were racing TLRs around that time in AMA Superbike and getting their asses handed to them by 750s, I'm just saying...
|
06-29-2009, 12:37 AM | #25 | |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Quote:
|
|
06-29-2009, 12:43 AM | #26 |
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R
Posts: 989
|
The number I saw from a buddy and a UK tuner said the number they were closer to was 88-92 stock at the rear wheel, I also saw the increase was to 119 but I went with the lower number because of the variances in attendants and dyno varibles.
__________________
Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war! |
06-29-2009, 12:54 AM | #27 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Oh okay... well anyway, the TLR is a great streetbike and they sound awesome with the Yosh pipes so I'm not sure what this is all about but claiming, by your numbers, a 60+ hp increase from a 90 hp bike... well, again that's pretty crazy but who knows? I don't claim to know everything about bikes and engines but damn that's 66% now without cracking the cases... Even at 135 hp that's a fuck load of power even with a big bore kit!
|
06-29-2009, 01:12 AM | #28 | |
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R
Posts: 989
|
Quote:
__________________
Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war! |
|
06-29-2009, 09:20 AM | #29 | |
yellow don't corner well
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City, KS
Moto: 06 ZX10R
Posts: 1,243
|
Quote:
the instructor that taught the Dyno class had worked for SpuerTrapp designing exhaust, he said it was usually very hard to get any improvement over the stock exhaust. materials to reduce weight was what he said was one of the things they could usually do. I got a short ride on a TLR, thought it was great. that and an RC51 would be the only non Kawasaki (big 4 anyway) that I would like to own. you are right, they sound awesome. I got to hear an RC51 going around the track at Daytona several years ago at a practice session. don't know if awesome actually fits for that experience it was so good.
__________________
|
|
06-29-2009, 10:18 AM | #30 |
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
Arghh!!! I lost a post! I looked up dyno numbers from a couple sources and came up with 121 hp from a stock TLR so 135 hp isn't unreasonable and 150 hp would be "obtainable" with some head work and a bit of a massage...
|
Bookmarks |
|
|