Buell question??

[FT BSTRD]

Originally Posted by drewpy

RC51

It just ain't the same.

[Dave]

goofy geometry and bad tire compatiility...you guys arent doing a lot to sell buells in this thread lol

[marko138]

Originally Posted by Dave

goofy geometry and bad tire compatiility...you guys arent doing a lot to sell buells in this thread lol

That part of our sinister plan.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by marko138

That part of our sinister plan.

hah between this and osp's blog im surprised they are still in business

[marko138]

Originally Posted by Dave

hah between this and osp's blog im surprised they are still in business

They are not for everyone. You either like them or you don't. They are great bikes.

[Porkchop]

Originally Posted by FT BSTRD

The SS, X, XT, and STT all share the "long" frame. That is a frame that holds 4.4 gallons (VS. 3.8 gallons in the S, Scg and R) and has a longer swing arm. The head geometry is also slightly different.

Of the "long" models, the STT is the best handling of the bunch. It came with upgraded suspension components.

The X has the longest travel suspension of the bunch with approximately 1.5-2 inches greater travel than other models in the line. The X has nearly 7" of ground travel for use in light off road duty.

If'n you aren't a galoot, the S, Scg and R have a much quicker geometry and will turn quicker than the long versions.

The long versions are more comfortable in that the seat rails are longer and provide for more seat to peg distance.

The SV line is very good, cheap, powerful, good handling, and provides many after-market options. Parts are cheap. You can probably build one from spare parts at a track day.

The Buell is very good, cheap, powerful, good handling, and provides SOME after-marekt options. Parts are cheap. You will probably be a party of one or two at a track day.

I tried both the SV and Buell when I was buying. Although it was a good engine, the SV didn't speak to me.

You are either a Buell person or you aren't. Test ride one or two and you'll know. For me, the Buell was the closest thing to a '69 Chevelle on two wheels you could get. It's just angry and grunty and loud.

For me it was comfortable like no other bike is. After riding 150 miles on the R, the X reminded me of why I picked it. The X just fits galoots.

Wow.. the Buell master! Thanks for the information. It did look like the STT was the most comfortable of the bunch. But I'm a fairing type guy and if any, the R speaks to me on looks.

So you are saying i could just go to a couple track days with some cash in hand and come with some parts to build a rideable SV???? For cheap???

[FT BSTRD]

Originally Posted by Porkchop

Wow.. the Buell master! Thanks for the information. It did look like the STT was the most comfortable of the bunch. But I'm a fairing type guy and if any, the R speaks to me on looks.

I understand. I, on the other hand, am more of a naked bike guy.

Originally Posted by Porkchop

So you are saying i could just go to a couple track days with some cash in hand and come with some parts to build a rideable SV???? For cheap???

Yep, there were two that ate it at the last track day. I bet you could have offered them something cheap.

Honestly, there have been so many and they are pretty popular track weapons that just about everyone has a box full of parts for them with them at the track day.

[GearGrabinGuy]

The 1125 looks pretty sweet. But idk im still a little iffy. I know OSP jerks it to them in his office. But my friend had a XB-9R when I lived in Tulsa, OK. Sure it had some torque from stop signs, but after the first second I was blasting past and not giving up. He shortly after purchasing it became sad that my 6 would wax him. I did ride it and I like the feel, and they do pretty well in the twisties. Id say they are comparable to a larger Super Moto. Still cool bikes, and since they are a new company I feel they have alot of room to grow and impress. 10 points on the cool factor though.

[Porkchop]

Originally Posted by GearGrabinGuy

The 1125 looks pretty sweet. But idk im still a little iffy. I know OSP jerks it to them in his office. But my friend had a XB-9R when I lived in Tulsa, OK. Sure it had some torque from stop signs, but after the first second I was blasting past and not giving up. He shortly after purchasing it became sad that my 6 would wax him. I did ride it and I like the feel, and they do pretty well in the twisties. Id say they are comparable to a larger Super Moto. Still cool bikes, and since they are a new company I feel they have alot of room to grow and impress. 10 points on the cool factor though.

Normally I am a fairing guy, but when it comes to the new 1125, I like the CR over the R. The fairing on the R is wierd. The CR is damn cool looking.

Still being an inexperienced rider I dont need the top end rush that a 6 offers. Thats why I'm really starting to think V-twin and its practicallity. Even tho all my friends have 6's. (05 R6, 05 CBR, 08 GSXR) The question is SV or XB....

[FT BSTRD]

Originally Posted by Porkchop

Normally I am a fairing guy, but when it comes to the new 1125, I like the CR over the R. The fairing on the R is wierd. The CR is damn cool looking.

Still being an inexperienced rider I dont need the top end rush that a 6 offers. Thats why I'm really starting to think V-twin and its practicallity. Even tho all my friends have 6's. (05 R6, 05 CBR, 08 GSXR) The question is SV or XB....

Psst. The CR is NAKED!


The 1125 is more like an RC51 in it's delivery. You'll ride the torque until the top end kicks in.

Great motor. You won't have any 600's running away from it.

Although it's a liter class bike, it doesn't have the top end punch that gets folks into trouble.

Twins are also great in that because the power pulses are spaced farther apart, the rear tire doesn't break traction quite as easily.

Problem is that you can't get a CR used yet.