Einstein proven right

pauldun170 · 11-25-2008, 10:39 AM

http://in.news.yahoo.com/48/20081121...n-prove_1.html

fnfalman · 11-25-2008, 11:46 AM

It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong.

Corey · 11-25-2008, 11:49 AM

I honestly thought this would be an article about some guy melting his skin off trying to fry a frozen turkey, thus adding more proof to Einstein's quote "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."

pauldun170 · 11-25-2008, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fnfalman

It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong.

Particle Man · 11-25-2008, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fnfalman

It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong.

agreed.

between this and day-to-day work in quantum mechanics the face of science is always changing...

Captain Morgan · 11-25-2008, 02:20 PM

So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory?

Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(c*c). These are both vastly different than e=mc2.

pauldun170 · 11-25-2008, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan

So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory?

Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(c*c). These are both vastly different than e=mc2.

Out of uncertainty I post this

Captain Morgan · 11-25-2008, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Out of uncertainty I post this

fasternyou929 · 11-25-2008, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Morgan

So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory?

Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(c*c). These are both vastly different than e=mc2.

e=mc2 is much better than one line where it was written "e-mc2".

Particle Man · 11-25-2008, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fasternyou929

"e-mc2".

boy would THAT fuck up the world of physics

11-25-2008, 10:39 AM	#1
pauldun170 Serious Business Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: New York Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr Posts: 9,723	Einstein proven right http://in.news.yahoo.com/48/20081121...n-prove_1.html

11-25-2008, 11:46 AM	#2
fnfalman Europhile Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: SoCal Moto: Aprilia RS125, Aprilia SR50 Factory, Aprilia Tuono, BMW Rockster, KTM 990 Adventure Posts: 1,875	It should be that Einstein hasn't been proven wrong. __________________ *Cogito Ergo Vroom - I think therefore I ride*

11-25-2008, 11:49 AM	#3
Corey AMA Supersport Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Florida Moto: Not a damn thing Posts: 2,612	I honestly thought this would be an article about some guy melting his skin off trying to fry a frozen turkey, thus adding more proof to Einstein's quote "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." __________________ Half man, half horse, half motorcycle. All awesome. "Your game is shit, your company is shit. Activision ruined you! Activision ruined you." - Francis

11-25-2008, 02:20 PM	#6
Captain Morgan Let's do another U-turn Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Indiana Moto: 2009 V-Strom Posts: 3,816	So, it took a "brainpower consortium" to prove a lone man's theory? Also note the article wasn't edited very well. They post it as e=mc2, which isn't technically correct. They either need to use a superscript for the 2, use the carrot symbol to denote the 2 means squared, or they need to break the equation down to make it correct in print if they can't do either of the aforementioned. These are two ways to correctly display the equation if it isn't possible to use a superscript for the 2: e=mc^2 or e=m(cc). These are both vastly different than e=mc2. Last edited by Captain Morgan; 11-25-2008 at 02:26 PM..*