|
03-17-2010, 10:54 AM | #1 |
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
You didn't earn that grade.
|
03-17-2010, 11:06 AM | #2 |
Vrooom
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: 06 ZX6R
Posts: 4,427
|
Interesting.
|
03-17-2010, 07:13 PM | #3 |
token jewboy
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: CBR 900, KLR ugly ass duckling, Gas Man
Posts: 10,799
|
I read the first 5 lines. the real problem with grading is that i took a test a few years ago and got 10 questions right (out of 50), the rest of the class did much worse, so I got an A on that test. In all reality I should have been given an F, I was just lucky to have a bunch of idiots in the class with me.
__________________
|
03-17-2010, 07:14 PM | #4 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Redneck Riviera, FL
Moto: 2003 VFR800f6
Posts: 2,531
|
Part of the problem is that while a 2.0 is supposed to be "average," at most colleges anything less than a 2.0 in a course means you dont get credit for that course and for all intents and purposes you failed.
That rule shifts the grading scale to mean that 2.0 - borderline failure 3.0 - average/satisfactory 4.0 - above average
__________________
|
03-17-2010, 10:16 PM | #5 |
Nomadic Tribesman
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brampton, Canada
Moto: '09 ER-6n
Posts: 11,150
|
Definitely an interesting shift.
As another point of interest when we're looking at applications for enrolment, the grades are weighted based on what school they came from. The same is true for every university in the Province. Past performance shows us where the grade is over-valued, based on performance.
__________________
"Everything's better with pirates." - Lodge, "Dorkness Rising" http://www.morallyambiguous.net/ |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|