Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > News Desk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2010, 07:03 PM   #1
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default Drug tested due to Fed. regulations and bought a Whizzinator? Watch your ass.

The inventor got a lighter sentence "because of his "extraordinary" cooperation with authorities". I wonder how much of that cooperation was giving the Feds their customer list.

http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/04/08/...rug-cheat.html

Calif. men who made drug-cheat device sentenced
Posted at 10:19 AM on Thursday, Apr. 08, 2010
By JOE MANDAK - Associated Press Writer

PITTSBURGH -- A California man who spent nearly six years in prison for a 1980s marijuana-trafficking conviction got six months in federal prison for running a company that sold a male prosthetic called the Whizzinator that helped men cheat on drug tests.

Gerald W. Wills, 67, of Los Angeles, sold the device and a product called Number 1 that could be used by either men or women, along with a synthetic urine to fill the devices.

Wills' since-disbanded company, Puck Technology Inc., of Signal Hill, Calif., advertised the devices on the Internet as a way for pilots, truck drivers and others whose safety is regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation to beat drug tests.

The Web site even included testimonials from those who used it.

"I have to pass a test while being observed, and not only was it undetectable, I passed with flying colors," one testimonial said. Another read, "I have to pass DOT drug screens every quarter and your product has saved my job countless times."

Wills' partner, Robert D. Catalano, 65, of Huntington Beach, Calif., was sentenced Tuesday to three years of probation.

The men pleaded guilty in 2008 to conspiracy to sell drug paraphernalia and conspiracy to defraud the United States, because the products were specifically marketed to beat federal drug tests.

The devices were sold from October 2005 through May 2008. The men disbanded the company and surrendered $300,000 in cash and all other assets as part of their plea agreement. As a result, U.S. District Judge David Cercone did not fine either man.

Prosecutors asked for leniency because the two men have continued to cooperate in other investigations. Assistant U.S. Attorney Mary McKeen Houghton would not detail those other investigations and her motion seeking leniency was under seal.

Catalano faced up to a year in prison under sentencing guidelines.

"I fully understand I was a criminal and took full responsibility for my actions," Catalano said in a tearful statement to the court. He said he panicked in September 2008 when a Metrolink commuter train crashed head-on into a freight train in Chatworth, Calif., killing 25 people.

"I was terrified he could have used one of my products to pass a drug test," Catalano said of the train's engineer. "I'm more sorry for my actions than I could ever say."

Drugs weren't a factor in the crash. The National Transportation Safety Board found the commuter train's engineer was distracted by text messaging.

Wills also expressed remorse, saying he offered, "No excuses, your honor."

Wills faced up to 14 months in prison under federal guidelines, but Cercone gave him six months because of his "extraordinary" cooperation with authorities. Cercone said Wills' drug record was too much to ignore saying, "The public would be outraged with a slap on the wrist."

Wills said after the hearing that he spent five years, nine months in federal prison after a marijuana-trafficking conviction in Montana in the 1980s, but he otherwise declined to comment.

"Mr. Wills accepts his punishment with grace and promises to be a good boy forever," said his attorney, Victor Sherman.

Attorneys for both men said their clients didn't realize the business was illegal and shut it down once they learned it was.

"Obviously, the immorality of it was clear from the beginning," said Catalano's attorney, Stanton Levenson. "But that's different from whether or not it's illegal."
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 10:41 PM   #2
t-homo
WSB Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 7,146
Default

No shit you can get in trouble for using synthetic piss.
t-homo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 02:36 AM   #3
tommymac
Moto GP Star
 
tommymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,022
Default

that stuff is big business now between the screening tests and people trying to get around them.

had a friend a few yrs back who had to be tested and he was a big time pothead. he knew he had a test comming up for a new job and asshole couldnt stay away from the pot for a few weeks. I gave hims some of my own urine since we knew I was clean. Turns out he messed something else up to get the job.
tommymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 10:12 AM   #4
z06boy
Letzroll
 
z06boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Norman area, NC
Moto: 07 Red R1 & 07 Blue R6
Posts: 5,265
Default

I had never even heard of the "Whizzinator" until within the last year when I heard another member here use the term. I honestly thought he was joking around...but obviously he wasn't. He's a drug and alcohol counselor and has seen pretty much all of the tricks.
z06boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 11:33 AM   #5
Kaneman
AMA Supersport
 
Kaneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Odessa, TX
Moto: 2000 Honda CBR1100XX Blackbird
Posts: 4,931
Default

Hmmm. So is it illegal to pee into a bottle to give someone clean urine to use for a civil job now? Interesting.

Piss tests are amazingly easy to pass, but I'll never take one again.
__________________
1982 Honda XR80 - blown motor, 1993 Kawasaki ZX6D - sold, 2001 Suzuki Bandit 1200S - sold, 1984 Honda Magna - sold, 2001 Kawasaki ZRX1200R - blown motor, 2007 Suzuki DL1000 V-Strom - totalled, 2003 Yamaha FZ1 - sold, 1994 Honda Magna - sold, 2001 Honda CBR600F4i - sold, 1998 Suzuki DR350 - stolen, 1989 Honda Super Magna - sold, 2007 Yamaha Stratoliner, 2000 Honda CBR 1100XX Blackbird
Kaneman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 11:57 AM   #6
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaneman View Post
Hmmm. So is it illegal to pee into a bottle to give someone clean urine to use for a civil job now? Interesting.

Piss tests are amazingly easy to pass, but I'll never take one again.
From what I understand, but not from personal experience, there are different levels of testing. The common basic test is supposed to be easy as hell. I have pothead friends who pass those without even slowing down their intake. The more thorough tests are supposed to look for all the markers indicating an attempts to fool the test and are much more difficult to get through with stuff in your system.
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.