Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Off Topic

View Poll Results: where does the shuttle belong?
New York 42 63.64%
Houston 3 4.55%
Other city 21 31.82%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2011, 08:34 PM   #171
Trip
Hold mah beer!
 
Trip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 80 Miles South of Moto Heaven
Moto: 08 R1200GS
Posts: 23,268
Default

Orbiters are a waste of time, we need to get back to long distance space flight. NASA actually did right by bailing on the shuttles and focusing on returning to the moon and maybe eventually mars. Let the private sector figure out the low orbit shit.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebbs15 View Post
according to the article tell him to drink ginger tea...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigger
Whatever,Stoner is a bitch! O.J. Simpson has TWO fucked knees and a severe hang nail on his left index finger but he still managed to kill two younger adults,sprint 200 feet to his car (wearing very expensive,yet uncomfortable Italian shoes) and make his get a way!!!
Trip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 11:54 PM   #172
Adeptus_Minor
Hopster
 
Adeptus_Minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Moto: 2009 Buell 1125R
Posts: 4,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeslice View Post
If the island of La Palma erupts, it's possible NY could be wiped out
...which is why I voted against New York too
(well, not specifically that, but I voted against NY too)
__________________
“Well, obviously before; after was all gendarmes and dick stitches.”
Adeptus_Minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:27 AM   #173
anthonyk
WERA White Plate
 
anthonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Moto: '01 Aprilia Falco
Posts: 1,041
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avatard View Post
Actually, a proper lift plane could take an orbiter most of the way up, and smaller external Ox tanks could make the boost into orbit without having to use any aluminum "Roman Candles". Remember, the orbiter has engines.
Yeah, but then again, put engines and tanks on the lift plane and you can increase payload capacity by taking the separate orbiter out of the picture completely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip
Orbiters are a waste of time, we need to get back to long distance space flight. NASA actually did right by bailing on the shuttles and focusing on returning to the moon and maybe eventually mars. Let the private sector figure out the low orbit shit.
Let the private sector figure out how to ferry people around, but if you're gonna go any significant distance from earth, it makes sense to build your ship in orbit. Something reusable that can ferry big payloads up and down might be pretty useful.
anthonyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 09:48 PM   #174
goof2
AMA Supersport
 
goof2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avatard View Post
Actually, a proper lift plane could take an orbiter most of the way up, and smaller external Ox tanks could make the boost into orbit without having to use any aluminum "Roman Candles". Remember, the orbiter has engines.
Regardless of how it is accomplished the Shuttle still has to get up to around 20,000mph to get to low earth orbit. There is currently only one option for achieving those kinds of speeds, "Roman Candles". Maybe someday we will develop a rail gun or space elevator which will negate that problem, but at that point the Shuttles will be long gone. Currently rockets are needed for either vertical or horizontal launch so the difference in safety is non-existent.
goof2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.