05-09-2010, 12:50 PM | #71 | |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
Quote:
Cheapens the look of the car so much. I'm with Karl, and the very first response in this thread: Stock FTW.
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
|
05-09-2010, 01:16 PM | #72 |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
STOCK IS STOCK
therefore it sucks I wouldn't go back to stock, just cover it up or change for different aftermarket. I do agree on the "18 yr old civic" comment being a bad thing. |
05-09-2010, 01:34 PM | #73 | |
moderator chick
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hill Country TX
Moto: Pasta Rockets
Posts: 8,917
|
Quote:
__________________
We have enough youth. How about a fountain of "smart"? Come Play at the Track!! http://www.elitetrackdays.com |
|
05-09-2010, 02:02 PM | #74 |
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
|
05-09-2010, 04:05 PM | #75 |
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Moto: 2001 Suzuki TL1000R
Posts: 989
|
I have seen some of the cars in that thread and while dim, you can see the lights. Its all about prep work and light coats. I also know that they were done over stock bulbs and that when done over L.E.D. lights the look is very cool, I will look later to see if I can find some pics.
__________________
Cry Havok! And let slip the hogs of war! |
05-09-2010, 04:16 PM | #76 |
WSB Champion
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 7,146
|
mpsautosalvage.com specializes in wrecked mustangs. I've never gotten anything from them, but i've only heard good things.
|
05-09-2010, 05:07 PM | #77 |
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Nov 2008
Moto: '04 Kawasaki ZX6RR
Posts: 3,392
|
I completely agree with this. I HATE when I can't see brake lights either because the douche bag doesn't check that s/he has lights out (any light for that matter) or because they are so blacked out.
|
05-09-2010, 05:47 PM | #78 |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Um... ok.
I'm just razzin AL |
05-09-2010, 05:54 PM | #79 |
Crotch Rocket Curmudgeon
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Here to integrity
Moto: Li'l red baby Ninja
Posts: 7,482
|
Tig, I don't don't know what the aversion is that you seem to have to the stock tail lights...this is, after all, a fucking Mustang we're talking about, and in the world of automotive design, the three vertical bars on the tail lights of a 'Stang are about as iconic as shit gets.
I gave you a link to some fresh, smoked stock designs...they'd even integrate well with the headlights you got there...but the tail lights on a 'Stang are just one of those things that if you fuck with it, it never quite looks right. You don't paint a smile on the Mona Lisa, because the mouth is what's special about that painting...dig? The lights are a defining character aspect of the Mustang's design. I can see refining it, massaging it, tweaking it a tad...but abandoning the iconic "3 vertical bar" thing is a vulgar move, and will never quite look "right" (again, strictly this man's opinion).
__________________
Insert free thought here. |
05-09-2010, 05:59 PM | #80 |
Trip's Assistant
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Ok its hard to argue with that!
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|